Changes for page SGA3 D1.2 Showcase 1

Last modified by fousekjan on 2022/07/04 18:31

From version 12.2
edited by fousekjan
on 2022/01/03 09:17
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 12.1
edited by fousekjan
on 2022/01/03 09:10
Change comment: Uploaded new attachment "image-20220103101022-3.png", version {1}

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -30,36 +30,9 @@
30 30  1. Dynamics of the model, and execution of a parameter study
31 31  1. Summary of the simulation results for the whole cohort
32 32  
33 -Link to the notebook:
34 -
35 -* [[virtual_ageing/notebooks/1_BNM_for_resting_state.ipynb>>https://lab.ch.ebrains.eu/user-redirect/lab/tree/shared/SGA3%20D1.2%20Showcase%201/virtual_ageing/notebooks/1_BNM_for_resting_state.ipynb]]
36 -
37 37  [[image:image-20220103100841-2.png]]
38 38  
39 -== Virtual ageing trajectories ==
40 40  
41 -The second steps shows the investigation of virtual ageing trajectory for each subject. In this context, we are going to show
42 -
43 -1. What we mean by virtual ageing and what is the empirical basis to investigate this approach
44 -1. How we can virtually age a subject using whole-brain modelling
45 -1. How the increase structure-function relationship relates to virtual ageing
46 -
47 -Link to the notebook:
48 -
49 -* [[virtual_ageing/notebooks/2_virtual_ageing_trajectories.ipynb>>https://lab.ch.ebrains.eu/user-redirect/lab/tree/shared/SGA3%20D1.2%20Showcase%201/virtual_ageing/notebooks/2_virtual_ageing_trajectories.ipynb]]
50 -
51 -[[image:image-20220103101022-3.png]]
52 -
53 -(% class="wikigeneratedid" %)
54 -== Inference with SBI ==
55 -
56 -Last step of the inter-individual variability workflow
57 -
58 -
59 -Link to the notebook:
60 -
61 -* [[virtual_ageing/notebooks/3_inference_with_SBI.ipynb>>https://lab.ch.ebrains.eu/user-redirect/lab/tree/shared/SGA3%20D1.2%20Showcase%201/virtual_ageing/notebooks/3_inference_with_SBI.ipynb]]
62 -
63 63  == Regional variability data ==
64 64  
65 65  The first step of the regional variability workflow loads the data from the Knowledge Graph and defines the regional bias on the model. In this case we require: 1) structural connectivity matrices, 2) GABA and AMPA receptor densities at each region, and 3) empirical resting-state fMRI data for fitting and validation of the simulations. The three datasets shall be characterised in the same parcellation.