Last modified by mhashemi on 2025/03/12 11:20

From version 10.1
edited by petkoski
on 2024/05/21 11:06
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 7.1
edited by petkoski
on 2024/05/21 10:57
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -16,27 +16,20 @@
16 16  
17 17  * A current topic in system neuroscience literature is the presence of brain activity in the absence of a task condition. These task-negative, spontaneous fluctuations occur in the so-called **rest state**, and a recurring theme of these fluctuations is that they have a network structure. Because TVB uses the structural connectivity of the brain as the backbone for simulating spontaneous activity, resting state activity and its network structure is a prime candidate for modeling in TVB.
18 18  
19 -= Other tutorials =
19 += Who has access? =
20 20  
21 -In addition to these noptebooks, we also refer to the readers to the collab for the Showcase 1 of HBP: "Degeneracy in neuroscience - when is Big Data big enough"
21 +Describe the audience of this collab.
22 22  
23 -[[https:~~/~~/wiki.ebrains.eu/bin/view/Collabs/sga3-d1-5-showcase-1/>>url:https://wiki.ebrains.eu/bin/view/Collabs/sga3-d1-5-showcase-1/]]
24 24  
25 25  = References =
26 26  
27 27  * (((
28 -Sanz-Leon P, Knock SA, Spiegler A, Jirsa VK. [[Mathematical framework for large-scale brain network modeling in The Virtual Brain>>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811915000051]]. Neuroimage. 2015 May 1;111:385-430.
27 +(Palesi et al., 2020): Palesi, F., Lorenzi, R. M., Casellato, C., Ritter, P., Jirsa, V., Wheeler- kingshott, C. A. M. G., and Angelo, E. D. (2020). **The importance of cerebellar connectivity on simulated brain dynamics. **Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, 14,111.
29 29  )))
30 30  * (((
31 -Schirner M, Domide L, Perdikis D, Triebkorn P, Stefanovski L, Pai R, Prodan P, Valean B, Palmer J, Langford C, Blickensdörfer A. [[Brain simulation as a cloud service: The Virtual Brain on EBRAINS>>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811922001021]]. NeuroImage. 2022 May 1;251:118973.
30 +(Monteverdi et al., 2022): Monteverdi A, Palesi F, Costa A, Vitali P, Pichiecchio A, Cotta Ramusino M, Bernini S, Jirsa V, Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott CAM and D’Angelo E (2022) **Subject-specific features of excitation/inhibition profiles in neurodegenerative diseases.** Front. Aging Neurosci. 14:868342. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.868342
32 32  )))
33 -* (((
34 -Lavanga M, Stumme J, Yalcinkaya BH, Fousek J, Jockwitz C, Sheheitli H, Bittner N, Hashemi M, Petkoski S, Caspers S, Jirsa V. [[The virtual aging brain: Causal inference supports interhemispheric dedifferentiation in healthy aging>>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811923005542]]. NeuroImage. 2023 Dec 1;283:120403.
35 35  )))
36 -* (((
37 -Wang HE, Triebkorn P, Breyton M, Dollomaja B, Lemarechal JD, Petkoski S, Sorrentino P, Depannemaecker D, Hashemi M, Jirsa VK. [[Virtual brain twins: from basic neuroscience to clinical use>>https://academic.oup.com/nsr/article/11/5/nwae079/7616087]]. National Science Review. 2024 May;11(5):nwae079.
38 -)))
39 -)))
40 40  
41 41  
42 42  (% class="col-xs-12 col-sm-4" %)